Posts tagged as:

New York City

Metropolitan Museum of Art Exterior  CC2 erin.kkr

Metropolitan Museum of Art Exterior CC2 erin.kkr

General Description

The digital image collection available on the website of The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is a mixed bag.  I refer, of course, not to the contents of the collection, but to the display and searchability of the subject matter of the works in the collection.

The Met’s description of the digital collection  is as follows:

The Collection Database is a searchable database of artworks and related materials from the permanent collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. An individual database record includes information about an object as well as images, when available. The Museum’s curators have selected several works of note within the collection Database as Highlights of the collection. Due to the extremely large number of objects in the Museum’s permanent collection, not all artworks are currently available in the collection Database. Furthermore, information contained in the database records is, in some cases, incomplete, and all information is subject to change according to ongoing research and new acquisitions.

This statement acknowledges that not all objects in the permanent collection are contained in the database, and that those which are do not always have associated images, BUT it would have been nice for the Met to give the user some sense of proportionality.  According to the site there are 128,347 items in the online collection.  But I can’t tell form this what portion of the permanent collection this represents,  The only piece of further information I can easily find is that the Highlights contain only 1407 objects. Equally important I can’t tell how many of  the 128,347 objects have associated images.  I can say, unfortunately, that it appears that the vast majority of the items don’t.  One can browse the works to see page after page of thumbnails stating “image not available”   What a drag. It is not a bad thing that so many objects lack images; better to have access to the text record than to have nothing at all.  It is a major oversight, however, that the interface does not allow [click to continue…]

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

CLICK!

by Denise on May 17, 2008

CLICK! submission     Photo credit: Elyse Taylor

CLICK! submission Photo credit: Elyse Taylor

A current exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art (BMA) called CLICK! is a great example of the creative role that museums can play in utilizing the web to involve users.  Click! is a multi stage project.  First, there was an open call for photographs for the exhibit on the theme of the “Changing Faces of Brooklyn.”  Then an open call for evaluation of the submitted photographs online was issued.  Finally an exhibit at the museum of the top 20% of the 389 photos submitted was assembled.  But that isn’t all.

There is also an exhibit of all the photographs, and multiple statistical views of the voting.  These results include very interesting data about the relative ratings of the raters (self-identified in 5 categories from naive to expert), along with a host of other data. I found this information as interesting as the exhibit itself.  Begging won’t help.  You’ll just have to visit the site yourself to find out how the ratings of experts compared to the ratings of the non-experts.  The site has lots of other great features, including an intelligent commentary, a look into the process of mounting the physical exhibit, the comments of raters about the photos, a blog, a podcast, and, novel to me, [click to continue…]

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }